Architecture Here and There |
|
« Still more from "Dead End Gene Pool" |
Main
| Collected entries and comments for the derisive moniker contest »
Illustrations: Above, corner detail of the Granoff Creative Arts Center, in Providence (photo by Iwan Baan, courtesy of Diller Scofidio + Renfro). Below, Angell Street facade; facade facing The Walk, another closeup of corner; lobby, with guard and Chira DelSesto; auditorium; wall of auditorium; staircase; split arts spaces. Beyond column text, more split space; yet more split space; view from within The Walk facade; view of The Walk and Angell Street; view of facade facing The Walk; tight closeup of accordion corner * * *
At least the GCAC is not boring, unlike most new modern architecture inflicted The façade that faces The Walk (a new, misconceived path apparently designed to direct students away from Thayer Street merchants) looks like an office building on the way to the airport, except that it appears to have suffered earthquake damage. One-half the building has shifted downward half a floor. The design lets students learning X in one art class spy on students learning Y in the art class next door. (That seems more conducive to distraction than to learning, but hey, I don't pretend to be up on the latest The façade most people will see on Angell is the more intriguing. Consistent with having experienced an earthquake, it looks crumpled and crushed, sort of like an accordion. Its windows look like eyes wincing in pain. Whether that's from being crushed or from the sound of accordion music is for Diller Scofidio + Renfro to know and the rest of us to find out. Some of these themes were evident in my contest to make up the best derisive moniker for the CAC (see "Why Ugly Buildings Get Stupid Names," Nov. 4). The entries included: "The Collator," "The Out Box," "The Super Incoming/Outgoing Desktop Mailbox," "The Stacked Shoeboxes," "The Squeezebox," "The Accordion," "The Big Wedgie," "Smirky," "The Stretch Marks," "The GAC Building (Gack!)," "Peekaboo" and "The Slot Machine."
"Darth Vader's Mini-Blinds," submitted by R. John Anderson, strikes me as best summing up the dark utility of this building devoted to the creative arts. Commenter Erik Evans put a positive spin on that: "I am amused by the way the architects designed it to look as if the gods had reached down from the heavens, slipped their fingers under the Evans nevertheless wondered why that was appropriate for a creative-arts center. As if in reply, commenter CLK (who submitted "Peekaboo") wrote, "How often do people wonder about the creative process, as in 'What do they do in there?' Maybe they thought it might encourage the public to take a look, literally." Perhaps. I toured the building on [My tour guide was Chira DelSesto, program coordinator for the Creative Arts Council, an umbrella group for art organizations at Brown. She graciously assured me that she already knew that the building was "not your cup of tea," and proceeded to describe how the architecture and the program for creative arts at Brown nevertheless fit together hand-in-glove. Because the But is that a good thing? That so many entries tapped into the same sinister iconography must mean something. Maybe it reveals a broad dismay with contemporary creative sensibilities that spurn our traditional artistic culture -- even as they increasingly dominate and even characterize it. In fact, the traditional culture that many artists think they are defying is long gone. How quaint is the notion that art should appeal to and foster society's most exalted ideas of the good, the true and the beautiful! This year's Super Bowl commercials and halftime entertainment only pushed the envelope of the sinkhole of our mainstream culture. The British writer Roger Scruton argues that too much Artists and artist wannabes celebrating the darkly silly new building this evening are fully invested in its downbeat allure. Does it smite the eye? If so, we are invited to applaud. David Brussat (dbrussat@projo.com) is a member of The Journal's editorial board. His blog at projo.com is called Architecture Here and There. CommentsPlease be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity are not allowed. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.Leave a comment |

Beauty shall return to architecture. I know it will. It must! Keep the torch lit.
Report Abuse
Please employ an architecture critic rather than a curmudgeon. Failing that, have him review classic buildings and not opine on new buildings or on changes to his apparently cherished way of life. Both the Granoff Center and the Walk are great additions to campus. The Center in particular performs its function of encouraging interdisciplinary communication and co-operation spectacularly well.
Report Abuse